You are hereSelection of relevant papers by IAGP members

Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
Haywood J, et al. Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall. Nature Climate Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1857.html
I
IPCC, Forster PM. IPCC Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.; 2014 p. . Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
IPCC, Forster PM. IPCC Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.; 2014 p. . Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
Irvine P, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ. Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts. Geophysical Research Letters . 2010;37:L18702.
Irvine PJ, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ. Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2011;116, D24112.
Irvine P, Lunt DJ, Stone EJ, Ridgwell A. The fate of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a geoengineered, high CO2 world. world Environmental Research Letters. 2009;4:045109.
Irvine P, Lunt DJ, Stone EJ, Ridgwell A. Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2009;D10106.
J
Jackson LS, Forster PM. Modeled rapid adjustments in diurnal temperature range response to CO2 and solar forcings. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50243/full
Jackson LS, Crook JA, Jarvis A, Leedal D, Ridgwell A, Vaughan N, Forster PM. Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophys. Res. Lett., [Internet]. 2015;42(4):1223–1231. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL062240/full
Jarvis AJ, Leedal DT. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): a control perspective. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2012;13(3):157-163. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.387/full
Jarvis AJ, Leedal DT, Hewitt CN. Climate-society feedbacks and the avoidance of dangerous climate change. Nature Climate Change [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1586.html#/main
Jenkins AKL, Forster PM. The inclusion of water with the injected aerosol reduces the simulated effectiveness of marine cloud brightening. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2013;14(3 ):164–169. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl2.434
Jenkins AKL, Forster PM, Jackson LS. The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2013;(13). Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/1659/2013/acp-13-1659-2013.html
Jones A, Haywood J, al. E. The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(17):9743–9752. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50762/full
Jones A, Haywood J, Boucher O. A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2010;12(2):176-183. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.291/full
K
Korhonen H, Carslaw KS, Forster PM, Mikkonen S, Gordon ND, Kokkola H. Aerosol climate feedback due to decadal increases in Southern Hemisphere wind speeds. Geophysical Research Letters. 2010;37:L02805 .
Kravitz B, Forster PM, Jones A, including, Jenkins AKL, et al. Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(19):11,175–11,186. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50856/abstract
Kravitz B, Robock A, Boucher O, Schmidt H, Taylor KE, Stenchikov G, Schulz M. The geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP). Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2011;12(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.316/full
L
Leedal D, Neal J, Beven K, Young P, and Bates P. Visualization approaches for communicating real-time flood forecasting level and inundation information. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2010;3: 140–150.
Lenton TM, Vaughan NE. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering proposals. ACP. 2009;9:5539-5561.
Li S, Jarvis AJ, Leedal DT. Are response function representations of the global carbon cycle ever interpretable?. Tellus: Series B. 2009;61(2)(371).
P
Parkhill K, Pidgeon N. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11.01 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.understanding-risk.org/
Pidgeon N, Corner A, Parkhill K, Spence A, Butler C, Poortinga W. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [Internet]. 2012;370(1974). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4176.full
Pidgeon N, Parkhill K, Corner A, Vaughan NE. Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. ; 2013. p. 219-239. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118551424;jsessionid=8B3750B30409940BEFBDC7BEE9CA7EB9.d04t01
Pidgeon N, Parkhill K, Corner A, Vaughan NE. Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nature Climate Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1807.html

IAGP logo

Our Partners

with the support of