You are hereSelection of relevant papers by IAGP members
Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members
. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [Internet]. 2012;370(1974). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4176.full
. The fate of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a geoengineered, high CO2 world. world Environmental Research Letters. 2009;4:045109.
. Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Special Theme Issue ‘Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget’ [Internet]. 2014;372(2031). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031/20140063
. Geoengineering knowledge: interdisciplinarity and the shaping of climate engineering research. Environment and Planning [Internet]. 2013;A: 45 (12),. Available from: http://www.envplan.com/openaccess/a45647.pdf
. The geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP). Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2011;12(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.316/full
. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): a control perspective. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2012;13(3):157-163. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.387/full
. Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A [Internet]. 2012;370(1974). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4166.abstract
. Geographical variations in the effectiveness and side effects of deep ocean carbon sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters. 2011;38, L17610.
. The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(17):9743–9752. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50762/full
. The inclusion of water with the injected aerosol reduces the simulated effectiveness of marine cloud brightening. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2013;14(3 ):164–169. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl2.434
. Interactions between reducing CO2 emissions, CO2 removal and solar radiation management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4343.short
. Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change [Internet]. 2014;May 2014. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6#
. Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378013001015
. Modeled rapid adjustments in diurnal temperature range response to CO2 and solar forcings. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50243/full
. An observationally based constraint on the water-vapor feedback. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(22):12,435–12,443. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020184/full
. ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378013001179
. The Oxford Principles. Climatic Change [Internet]. 2013;(Part of special issue "Geoengineering Research and its Limitations"). Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2/fulltext.html
. Perceptions of geoengineering:public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Climate Change [Internet]. 2012;3(5):451-466. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.176/abstract
. Quantifying components of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres [Internet]. 2014;119(12). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JD021710/abstract
. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering proposals. ACP. 2009;9:5539-5561.
. Reduced efficacy of marine cloud brightening geoengineering due to in-plume aerosol coagulation: parameterization and global implications. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2013;13:10385–10396. Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/10385/2013/acp-13-10385-2013.html
. Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. WIRES Climate Change [Internet]. 2013;5(1). Available from: http://wires.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WCC261.html
. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Climate Change [Internet]. 2012;3(6). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.197/abstract Abstract
. Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(19):11,175–11,186. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50856/abstract
. Sea-spray geoengineering in the HadGEM2-ES earth-system model: radiative impact and climate response. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2012;12. Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/10887/2012/acp-12-10887-2012.html
