You are hereSelection of relevant papers by IAGP members
Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members
The inclusion of water with the injected aerosol reduces the simulated effectiveness of marine cloud brightening. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2013;14(3 ):164–169. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asl2.434
.
The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(17):9743–9752. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50762/full
.
Géo-ingénierie du climat perspectives britanniques. London; 2012 p. . Available from: http://www.bulletins-electroniques.com/actualites/69387.htm
.
Geographical variations in the effectiveness and side effects of deep ocean carbon sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters. 2011;38, L17610.
.
Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environment Magazine . 2010;(52):26-37.
.
Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A [Internet]. 2012;370(1974). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4166.abstract
.
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): a control perspective. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2012;13(3):157-163. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.387/full
.
The geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP). Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2011;12(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.316/full
.
Geoengineering knowledge: interdisciplinarity and the shaping of climate engineering research. Environment and Planning [Internet]. 2013;A: 45 (12),. Available from: http://www.envplan.com/openaccess/a45647.pdf
.
Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Special Theme Issue ‘Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget’ [Internet]. 2014;372(2031). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031/20140063
.
The fate of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a geoengineered, high CO2 world. world Environmental Research Letters. 2009;4:045109.
.
Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [Internet]. 2012;370(1974). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/370/1974/4176.full
.
'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11.02. 2011.
.
‘Experiment Earth?’ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-02. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.understanding-risk.org/ Abstract
.
Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(3). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50174/full
.
Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: A review for developing a science plan. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment [Internet]. 2012;41(4):pp 350-369 . Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5
.
Ecosystem Impacts of Geoengineering: A Review for Developing a Science Plan. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment [Internet]. 2012;41(4):350-369. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u562q0218461k416/ Abstract
.
Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study. In: Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. ; 2013. p. 219-239. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118551424;jsessionid=8B3750B30409940BEFBDC7BEE9CA7EB9.d04t01
.
Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nature Climate Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1807.html
.
Decline of Arctic sea ice: Evaluation and weighting of CMIP5 projections. Journal of Geophysical Research [Internet]. 2014;119(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020593/full
.
A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2010;12(2):176-183. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.291/full
.
Comparison of surface albedo feedback in climate models and observations. Geophysical Research Letters [Internet]. 2014;41(5). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL059280/full
.
Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review. Surveys in Geophysics [Internet]. 2012;33((3-4) 2012):619-635. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h4733187m4g747l8/
.
Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2011;116, D24112.
.
Climate-society feedbacks and the avoidance of dangerous climate change. Nature Climate Change [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1586.html#/main
.