Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members

Li S, Jarvis AJ, Leedal DT. Are response function representations of the global carbon cycle ever interpretable?. Tellus: Series B. 2009;61(2)(371).

• Google Scholar

Singarayer JS, Ridgwell A, Irvine P. Assessing the benefits of crop albedo bio-geoengineering . Environmental Research Letters. 2009;4.

• Google Scholar

Irvine P, Lunt DJ, Stone EJ, Ridgwell A. Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2009;D10106.

• Google Scholar

Irvine P, Lunt DJ, Stone EJ, Ridgwell A. The fate of the Greenland Ice Sheet in a geoengineered, high CO2 world. world Environmental Research Letters. 2009;4:045109.

• Google Scholar

Lenton TM, Vaughan NE. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering proposals. ACP. 2009;9:5539-5561.

• Google Scholar

Korhonen H, Carslaw KS, Forster PM, Mikkonen S, Gordon ND, Kokkola H. Aerosol climate feedback due to decadal increases in Southern Hemisphere wind speeds. Geophysical Research Letters. 2010;37:L02805 .

• Google Scholar

Irvine P, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ. Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts. Geophysical Research Letters . 2010;37:L18702.

• Google Scholar

Corner A, Pidgeon N. Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environment Magazine . 2010;(52):26-37.

• Google Scholar

Leedal D, Neal J, Beven K, Young P, and Bates P. Visualization approaches for communicating real-time flood forecasting level and inundation information. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2010;3: 140–150.

• Google Scholar

Jones A, Haywood J, Boucher O. A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2010;12(2):176-183. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.291/full

• Google Scholar

Beven K, Leedal D, Alcock R. Uncertainty and Good Practice in Hydrological Prediction. Vatten [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/49399/

• Google Scholar

Crook JA, Forster PM. A balance between radiative forcing and climate feedback in the modeled 20th century temperature response. Journal of Geophysical Research [Internet]. 2011;116. Available from: http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011JD015924.shtml

• Google Scholar

Crook JA, Jones L, Forster PM, Crook R. Climate change impacts on future photovoltaic and concentrated solar power energy output. Energy and environmental science [Internet]. 2011;4. Available from: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2011/EE/c1ee01495a

• Google Scholar

Irvine PJ, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ. Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2011;116, D24112.

• Google Scholar

Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon P. 'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11.02. 2011.

• Google Scholar

Kravitz B, Robock A, Boucher O, Schmidt H, Taylor KE, Stenchikov G, Schulz M. The geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP). Atmospheric Science Letters [Internet]. 2011;12(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.316/full

• Google Scholar

Ridgwell A, Rodengen TJ, Kohfeld KE. Geographical variations in the effectiveness and side effects of deep ocean carbon sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters. 2011;38, L17610.

• Google Scholar

Parkhill K, Pidgeon N. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11.01 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.understanding-risk.org/

• Google Scholar

Crook JA, Forster PM, Stuber N. Spatial Patterns of Modeled Climate Feedback and Contributions to Temperature Response and Polar Amplification. Journal of Climate [Internet]. 2011;24(14). Available from: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2011JCLI3863.1

• Google Scholar

Corner A, Parkhill K, and Pidgeon N. ‘Experiment Earth?’ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-02. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.understanding-risk.org/ Abstract

• Google Scholar

Galarraga M, Szerszynski B. Making Climates: Solar Radiation Management and the Ethics of Fabrication. In: Preston CJ Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management . Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management . Lanham, MD; 2012. p. . Available from: https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739175408

• Google Scholar

Haywood J, Jones A. Sea-spray geoengineering in the HadGEM2-ES earth-system model: radiative impact and climate response. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2012;12. Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/10887/2012/acp-12-10887-2012.html

• Google Scholar

Bellamy R, Jones S, Pidgeon N, Ridgwell A, Vaughan NE. Géo-ingénierie du climat perspectives britanniques. London; 2012 p. . Available from: http://www.bulletins-electroniques.com/actualites/69387.htm

• Google Scholar

Russell LM, (incldg Vaughan NE ), et al. Ecosystem Impacts of Geoengineering: A Review for Developing a Science Plan. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment [Internet]. 2012;41(4):350-369. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u562q0218461k416/ Abstract

• Google Scholar

Russell LM, including, Vaughan NE, et al. Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: A review for developing a science plan. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment [Internet]. 2012;41(4):pp 350-369 . Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5

• Google Scholar